XFC | eXtreme Fast Control Technology

XFC technologies

Distributed-Clocks

In a normal, discrete control loop, actual value acquisition occurs at a certain time (input component), the result is transferred to the control system (communication component), the response is calculated (control component), the result is communicated to the set value output module (output component) and issued to the process (controlled system).

The crucial factors for the control process are: minimum response time, deterministic actual value acquisition (i.e. exact temporal calculation must be possible), and corresponding deterministic set value output. At what point in time the communication and calculation occurs in the meantime is irrelevant, as long as the results are available in the output unit in time for the next output, i.e. temporal precision is required in the I/O components, but not in the communication or the calculation unit.

The distributed EtherCAT clocks therefore represent a basic XFC technology and are a general component of EtherCAT communication. All EtherCAT devices have their own local clocks, which are automatically and continuously synchronised with all other clocks via the EtherCAT communication. Different communication run-times are compensated, so that the maximum deviation between all clocks is generally less than 100 nanoseconds. The current time of the distributed clocks is therefore also referred to as system time, because it is always available across the whole system.

Time-Stamp/Multi-Timestamp

Process data is usually transferred in its respective data format (e.g. one bit for a digital value or one word for an analog value). The temporal relevance of the process record is therefore inherent in the communication cycle during which the record is transferred. However, this also means that the temporal resolution and accuracy is limited to the communication cycle.

Timestamped data types contain a timestamp in addition to their user data. This timestamp – naturally expressed in the ubiquitous system time – enables provision of temporal information with significantly higher precision for the process record. Timestamps can be used for inputs (e.g. to identify the time of an event occurred) and outputs (e.g. timing of a response). This way it is possible to determine, for example, the precise point in time when an output is to be switched. The switching task is executed independently of the bus cycle.

While timestamp terminals can execute one switching task or switching event per bus cycle, multi-timestamp terminals can execute up to 32 switching tasks or switching events per cycle.

Oversampling

Process data is usually transferred exactly once per communication cycle. Conversely, the temporal resolution of a process record directly depends on the communication cycle time. Higher temporal resolution is only possible through a reduction in cycle time – with associated practical limits.

Oversampling data types enable multiple sampling of a process record within a communication cycle and subsequent (inputs) or prior (outputs) transfer of all data contained in an array. The oversampling factor describes the number of samples within a communication cycle and is therefore a multiple of one. Sampling rates of 200 kHz can easily be achieved, even with moderate communication cycle times.

xf-oversampling-abtastung.gif

Triggering of the sampling within the I/O components is controlled by the local clock (or the global system time), which enables associated temporal relationships between distributed signals across the whole network.

xfc-oversampling.gif

Fast I/O

Very fast physical responses require suitably short control cycle times in the associated control system. A response can only take place once the control system has detected and processed an event.

The traditional approach for achieving cycle times in the 100 μs range relies on special separate controllers with their own, directly controlled I/Os. This approach has clear disadvantages, because the separate controller has only very limited information about the overall system and therefore cannot make higher-level decisions. Reparameterisation options (e.g. for new workpieces) are also limited. Another significant disadvantage is the fixed I/O configuration, which generally cannot be expanded.

xfc-process-image.gif

Subordinate special control (limited process image)

xfc-process-image-2.gif

Fast central control (complete process image)

Further information